Full-Scale Trade War Erupts as US and China Impose Tit-for-Tat Tariffs

Stay connected with BizTech Community—follow us on Instagram and Facebook for the latest news and reviews delivered straight to you.

The United States and China have plunged into a full-blown trade war after President Donald Trump imposed a staggering 125% tariff on Chinese imports, prompting an immediate and equivalent retaliatory response from Beijing. The rapidly escalating conflict between the world’s two largest economies has already begun to disrupt global markets and threatens to reverberate throughout the international economic system.

The U.S. administration’s move, which increased tariffs to as high as 145% on some Chinese products, is the most aggressive to date and marks a sharp deterioration in already tense trade relations. China’s Ministry of Commerce responded by hiking its tariffs on U.S. goods to 125%, vowing to “fight to the end.”

The combined trade in goods between the two nations totaled approximately $585 billion in 2023, with the U.S. importing $440 billion from China while exporting just $145 billion, resulting in a $295 billion trade deficit. President Trump has frequently cited exaggerated figures—up to $1 trillion—to justify his protectionist measures.

Trump’s strategy appears to rely heavily on brinkmanship. Critics describe it as a manifestation of his “madman theory,” where the president pushes extreme actions to gain leverage. Trump has repeatedly insisted his personal rapport with Chinese President Xi Jinping will resolve the crisis, claiming, “He’s been a friend of mine for a long period of time.”

However, the Chinese leadership has shown no signs of yielding. Xi responded with defiance, saying China is “not afraid.” Trump administration insiders reportedly told Chinese officials not to retaliate and to have Xi request a call with Trump—an approach perceived in Beijing as humiliating and politically untenable.

The tariffs affect a wide swath of goods critical to both economies. From China, the U.S. imports smartphones, computers, toys, electronics, and electric vehicle batteries. Many of these products are manufactured in China for American companies like Apple, which has seen a 20% drop in its stock price over the past month due to the trade tensions. UBS estimates that a 256 GB iPhone 16 Pro Max, previously retailing for $1,199, could soon cost $1,999 in the U.S. as a result of the new tariffs.

In return, U.S. exports to China—mainly soybeans, petroleum, and pharmaceuticals—will also become more expensive, affecting Chinese consumers and industries. Soybeans, in particular, are vital to China’s agriculture sector, feeding its massive pig population.

Beyond tariffs, both countries possess other economic weapons. China dominates the global processing of essential industrial metals such as copper, lithium, and rare earths. It has already restricted exports of gallium and germanium, used in military technologies like radar and thermal imaging. Analysts fear Beijing could further limit exports of these and other critical materials.

Meanwhile, the U.S. could escalate its technology blockade, initially expanded under President Joe Biden, by further restricting China’s access to advanced semiconductors vital for artificial intelligence and defense applications.

Peter Navarro, Trump’s former trade advisor, has suggested the U.S. pressure third-party countries like Cambodia, Vietnam, and Mexico to reduce ties with China or risk losing access to the U.S. market. This tactic aims to crack down on the rerouting of Chinese goods through Southeast Asia to circumvent tariffs.

The economic stakes are enormous. The U.S. and China together account for 43% of global GDP. A prolonged trade war between them could trigger a global slowdown or even recession. Countries dependent on global trade—especially those in Asia and Europe—could suffer severely from reduced investment, disrupted supply chains, and shrinking consumer demand.

China, which already runs a $1 trillion goods surplus, is producing far more than it consumes. Much of this production is state-subsidized, with low-cost loans and financial incentives supporting key industries. If shut out of the U.S. market, Chinese manufacturers may flood other countries with excess goods, potentially undercutting local producers and sparking trade disputes elsewhere. UK Steel has warned that redirected Chinese steel could threaten jobs and wages in Britain.

Economists note that decades of economic integration between the U.S. and China have brought both benefits and drawbacks. American consumers enjoyed low-cost goods, while China lifted millions out of poverty and developed high-tech industries. But Washington’s long-held belief that trade would liberalize China’s political system has not materialized. Critics now argue that the U.S. effectively empowered a geopolitical rival.

What was once seen as economic interdependence serving as a deterrent to conflict has now turned into a rationale for decoupling. The talk in Washington and Beijing is no longer about cooperation but separation—setting the stage for a profound shift in the global economic order.

As both governments dig in, hopes for a quick resolution are fading. The world is bracing for the ripple effects of a clash between two superpowers whose economic entanglement once symbolized globalization—and now epitomizes its unraveling.