Stay connected with BizTech Community—follow us on Instagram and Facebook for the latest news and reviews delivered straight to you.
In a move that highlights growing skepticism toward AI-driven plagiarism detectors, Curtin University has announced it will disable Turnitin’s AI writing detection feature starting January 1, 2026. The decision affects all campuses and study periods, though the platform’s core originality checks for text matching will continue as usual. This shift comes amid mounting criticism over the tool’s accuracy and fairness in an era where generative AI like ChatGPT is ubiquitous in education.
The university’s announcement, detailed in an official update, emphasizes a commitment to “strengthen trust and clarity in assessment” while ensuring practices are “fair, relevant, and future-ready.” Curtin aims to evolve its assessment methods to better reflect real-world applications of AI and digital tools, without relying on what it views as an unreliable automated safeguard. For the remainder of 2025, students are advised to submit assignments through Turnitin normally, with no immediate changes to workflows.
Reliability Under Fire: The Core of the Controversy
At the heart of Curtin’s decision is a broader debate about the effectiveness of AI detection software. Turnitin’s tool, which scans submissions for signs of AI-generated content, has faced intense scrutiny from academics and researchers. Critics argue that it produces inconsistent results and high rates of false positives, potentially unfairly penalizing students whose work might mimic AI patterns due to stylistic or structural similarities.
Dr. Mark A. Bassett, an academic integrity expert from Charles Sturt University, has been vocal in calling for greater transparency in these systems. He advocates for public access to testing algorithms, standardized datasets, independent evaluations, and detailed technical reports to validate their claims. Independent tests, such as those conducted by Tadhg Blommerde at Northumbria University, revealed significant variations in the detector’s performance, especially against tools designed to “bypass” AI identification. Turnitin has defended its technology, stating that models are “continuously researched and refined,” but acknowledges that no system can eliminate all false positives and stresses the importance of human oversight.
This isn’t an isolated incident. Other institutions and even some AI detection providers have scaled back or abandoned similar features due to reliability issues. Dr. Bassett praised Curtin’s move on LinkedIn, noting it aligns with a growing trend among educators to prioritize ethical, evidence-based approaches over potentially flawed tech.
Implications for Students and Educators
For students at Curtin, the change means a continued emphasis on personal responsibility for academic integrity. The university will still review assignments for consistency and ethical standards, recommending the use of approved tools like Curtin Grammarly and Turnitin’s Authorship function to affirm originality. Instructors may introduce new assessment strategies that incorporate AI use in ways that mirror professional environments, such as collaborative projects or AI-assisted brainstorming, rather than outright bans.
Community reactions have been mixed. On Reddit’s r/curtin forum, users expressed relief that only the Gen-AI detection would be disabled, with text-matching checks intact to prevent traditional plagiarism. However, some worry that it could lead to a more lenient environment, while others view it as a progressive step toward trusting students in an AI-integrated world.
Read also: 10 Best AI Text Generators of 2025
Broader Trends in EdTech and AI Ethics
This development underscores a pivotal moment in educational technology. As AI tools become staples in writing and research, universities worldwide are grappling with how to adapt policies without stifling innovation. Curtin’s decision could inspire similar actions at other institutions, potentially reshaping how academic integrity is enforced in the digital age.
Turnitin, a dominant player in edtech with millions of users, has not yet issued a specific response to Curtin’s announcement, but the company’s ongoing refinements suggest it may address these concerns through updates. For now, the focus remains on balancing technological advancement with equitable assessment practices.
